I am currently over Ontario enroute from Boston. I look down on the landscape of farms, interspersed towns, and the city of Toronto in the distance. It is a route I have traveled often, especially when I was based in Rochester. I fondly remember trips to Canada, and the palpable sense of a difference in tolerance and priorities as I crossed the border. The newspaper in my seat pocket recounts the unrest in the Middle East, and concerns that oil prices rising above $100/ barrel will inhibit Americas own economic recovery. Gas is $4 a gallon in LA, yet, I don’t see any fewer cars on the road.(Driving, in California, is freedom.) There are protests in countries that we normally don’t recognize as foci of discontent – Tunisia and Liberia for example. We wonder what drives people to risk their lives to overthrow a government, when they know that whatever follows could be as equally oppressive. In a commentary, WSJ columnist Michael Novak notes that the desire for liberty is universal and rooted in basic Judeo – Christian beliefs. We talk of free choice, and consequences – whether to eat the apple, whether to accept a deity or idols, how we choose to do business with one another. What I am realizing is that even the replacement of one corrupt government with another, is an expression of the peoples freedom to choose their destiny. Whether extremists can recognize this basic human value or will continue to oppress women and the less well to do remains to be seen.
I am returning from one of my final weekends in the healthcare management course at the Harvard School of Public Health. As we looked at payment systems, it was not surprising that the US high cost for moderate quality paradigm was again examined. Classmates from Israel, the Netherlands, Australia, Canada, and Dubai discussed their own countries; how resources for health care were collected, how they were pooled, and how they were distributed. We fervently debated market pressures, the malpractice environment, and free market competition. Trying to place any of their systems in the US, despite the fact that there was “more bang for the buck,” seemed untenable.
Then we reframed the discussion, and the light went on – it’s all about choice.
Americans are fiercely independent, and pride themselves on being able to guide their own destitny. There is some sense of social responsibility for the less fortunate, but the disparities between the haves and the have nots are extreme. Americans want free choice in whether they drink or smoke, or want to be able to take a medication in lieu of exercise - and they don’t like to wait. This impatient spirit helped us accomplish great things in the past, but may be blinding us to the realities of the present.
There is no question that the American health system is expensive and inefficient. It is focused on technological repair of disease as opposed to a societal understanding of health, responsibility, and support. We realized that by dealing with the economic disparities, many of the health disparities would be ameliorated.
“My God,” you say, “He’s moved to California and is eating too much granola.”
Not so. I believe in technological advances in medicine to reduce suffering. Surgery is one of the most cost effective ways to return someone to health and being again productive. My classmate, who is Chief of Cardiac Surgery at the Hague, does 8-12 case /week – as part of a well organized integrated system in a relatively small country. It has nothing to do with socialized medicine.
Looking at the other countries we discussed, the populations are fairly homogeneous, resources can be concentrated near population centers, and from the time you are a child, there is an understanding that you may need to wait to have your needs met, but they will be. America is vast, we have huge variances in population density and medical resources. There is a safety net available, in public hospitals and emergency rooms but it is not the best way to provide continuity of care.
So how do we tie the unrest in many of the middle eastern countries to public health. And how do we help Americans realize that there must be a change in their perceptions and responsibilities?
It is by understanding that as humans, we want some control of our destiny. Depending on how well our basic needs are met,(remember Maslow’s pyramid?) we are willing to trade some free choice. But when oppression is coupled with poverty, an uprising is inevitable. In a similar manner, American health care is impoverished in the midst of plenty, and the shift must come at the center – with the patient.
Being proactive in your health, making good choices, and partnering with your provider isn’t limiting – it’s the ultimate source of freedom and self actualization.
No comments:
Post a Comment